Re: Disclosure Debate - yet again

From: Patrick Trapp (ptrapp_at_NEX-TECH.COM)
Date: 10/08/04

  • Next message: Matthew Ramadanovic: "Re: Disclosure Debate - yet again" 
    Date:         Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:34:42 -0500
To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM

    Russ,

    If the messages published on your list are indicative, I'm light-years less
    sophisticated than many of your list participants. I've been watching
    today's debate with interest because I quite frankly don't have the time
    and experience to develop an intelligent opinion on the matter without
    seeing such discourse. Thanks for sharing it with us.

    However, I respond because your point is excellent. While I'm not going to
    try to quantify the value / danger of the various disclosure methods
    discussed today, your point appears to right on the mark to me.

    For what it's worth from someone of my caliber, well done, sir!

    Have a great weekend,
    Patrick Trapp 

    --
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:
Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field.
--
  • Next message: Matthew Ramadanovic: "Re: Disclosure Debate - yet again"