Re: CWS = Crummy Windows Security
From: Ron Parker (ron_at_PARKRRRR.COM)
Date: 10/01/04
- Previous message: Drews, Jane E: "Re: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 - Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987)"
- In reply to: Andrew Aronoff: "CWS = Crummy Windows Security"
- Next in thread: Mitch Stein: "Possible new SP2 bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:59:03 -0500 To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
At 04:35 PM 9/30/2004 +0200, Andrew Aronoff wrote:
>AppInit_Dlls is a gaping security hole. Unfettered access to this
>value should be removed ASAP from NT4/W2K/WXP.
Unfettered? What's "unfettered" mean? By default, AppInit_DLLs
is read-only for all but administrators and system. If your users
are running untrusted software as administrators, that key is the
least of your worries.
-- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field. --
- Previous message: Drews, Jane E: "Re: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 - Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987)"
- In reply to: Andrew Aronoff: "CWS = Crummy Windows Security"
- Next in thread: Mitch Stein: "Possible new SP2 bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]