Re: Need to purge vulnerable gdiplus.dll?

From: Ben (bda20_at_CAM.AC.UK)
Date: 09/30/04

  • Next message: Ben Conrad: "Re: Need to purge vulnerable gdiplus.dll?"
    Date:         Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:30:45 +0100
    To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
    
    

    On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Matthias Fichtner wrote:

    >Russ wrote:
    >> I have received in excess of 10 responses from people
    >> who have, one way or another, been replacing vulnerable
    >> versions of gdiplus.dll (anywhere they find them) with the
    >> updated version. *They* say they have not encountered any
    >> problems.
    >
    >I've tried that approach and failed. For example, the current version of
    >Microsoft's PowerPoint 2003 Viewer (as downloaded yesterday) crashes, if
    >you replace its vulnerable gdiplus.dll with an updated version of the DLL.

    This hasn't proved to be the case with the Windows 2000 Workstation SP4
    (all current hotfixes) machines I'm running here. I have PowerPoint 2003
    Viewer on them (no Office installation at all) and currently there have
    been no problems. Did you replace the v6 GDIPLUS.DLL (for some reason the
    name is all in upper case for v6) with a non-vulnerable v6, or did you
    replace it with a v5 gdiplus.dll (for some reason the name is all in lower
    case for v5)?

    As near as I can make out, the non-vulnerable versions are

    Version 5: 5.1.3102.1360 and possibly 5.1.3102.2180
    Version 6: 6.0.3264.0

    Ben

    --
    Sysadmin, Faculty of History, University of Cambridge, England
    Tel: +44 (0)1223 (3)35315  |  Email: Ben@hist.cam.ac.uk
    Plugger of wire, typer of keyboard, imparter of Clue
            Life Is Short.          It's All Good.
    --
    NTBugtraq Editor's Note:
    Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field.
    --
    

  • Next message: Ben Conrad: "Re: Need to purge vulnerable gdiplus.dll?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: OT - Cant we all agree????
      ... The reason is that so many decent, honorable, ... I've observed your thoughtful and measured responses to Powell over ... Jeff is who he is. ... Is he the most important design engineer in the ...
      (rec.music.classical.recordings)
    • Re: OT - Cant we all agree????
      ... posters, why is it that I keep wandering into threads which they have ... The reason is that so many decent, honorable, ... I've observed your thoughtful and measured responses to Powell over ... Is he the most important design engineer in the ...
      (rec.music.classical.recordings)
    • Re: Hardy-Weinberg law
      ... The finiteness of populations does not cause an excess ... Similarly, there is no reason ... started off with a discussion about the H-W model, ... We know nothing of "reality" except via the theories ...
      (sci.bio.evolution)
    • Re: An Enemy of the People
      ... incite the most responses. ... This means it is useless to reason with him in any way. ... Bacarisse in particular spends a lot of time ... and Heathfield's contributions show his limitations. ...
      (comp.programming)
    • Re: OS X compile
      ... Please do not be rude. ... I don't like Neo because he is continually, repeatedly, consistently, ... it has become since his responses to me have convinced me that he is not ... even slightly amenable to reason in this matter - and it would have ...
      (rec.games.roguelike.angband)