Re: [Vmyths.com ALERT] Hysteria predicted for 'JPEG Processor' vulnerability
From: Shawn Asmus (shawn_at_ASCMO.COM)
Date: 09/16/04
- Previous message: Dave English: "Re: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 - Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987)"
- Maybe in reply to: Rob Rosenberger: "[Vmyths.com ALERT] Hysteria predicted for 'JPEG Processor' vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:46:02 -0500 To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
This article would be much more effective if it omitted the speculative language it so vehemently opposes. Makes me wonder where the hysteria begins?
"Watch for breathless speculation and hysteria in the coming days. Some naïve system administrators MAY TELL REPORTERS they'll delete JPEG files ..."
"The "Code Red" worms successfully exploited a buffer overrun in 2001, and Vmyths believes SOME REPORTERS WILL ALLUDE TO THIS -- as if to imply a horrific JPEG attack MAY be just around the corner. "
"Vmyths SUSPECTS a hoax virus alert will arise ... (It's practically a self-fulfilling prophesy.)"
Shawn Asmus, MCSD, CISSP
-----
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:
Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field.
-----
- Previous message: Dave English: "Re: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 - Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987)"
- Maybe in reply to: Rob Rosenberger: "[Vmyths.com ALERT] Hysteria predicted for 'JPEG Processor' vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]