Re: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 - Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987)

From: Sergile, Daniel (COX-Atlanta) (Daniel.Sergile_at_COX.COM)
Date: 09/23/04

  • Next message: Jeffrey Thomas: "SANS has release a GDI scanning tool" 
    Date:         Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:11:00 -0400
To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM

    Sorry folks I had a typo on the site
    www.k-otik.com/exploits

    Also did some testing on the shell code for my company this is what I
    have so far

    McAfee antivirus DAT 4394 protects against it as well as 4392.
    Works if it is copied to the desktop executed or attempted to display
    via outlook.

    About the shell code: you do have to REM out some lines and change /xCC/
    to /x90/ in one spot near the bottom to get it to successfully work.

    Daniel Sergile, CISSP
    Information Security Engineer

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sergile, Daniel (CCI-Atlanta)
    Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:42 AM
    To: 'Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List'
    Subject: RE: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 - Buffer
    Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987)

    Well the time has come. We have 3 exploits out for the MS04-028
    vulnerability.

    www.k-oitk.com/exploits has 3 exploits

    1. Adds Administrator group account
    2. Spawns Shell code
    3. Locks up the box and requires reboot

    These have been tested on XP SP1 English and Italian versions. It DOES
    NOT work of XP SP2

    Just and FYI.

    Daniel Sergile, CISSP
    Information Security Engineer

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
    [mailto:NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM] On Behalf Of Kurt Levitan
    Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 10:56 AM
    To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
    Subject: Re: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 - Buffer
    Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987)

    Do you know if Outlook uses the GDI from Office or from IE? We can
    easily
    deploy the OS and the IE versions of the patch but deploying an Office
    patch
    is difficult in our environment (long story). I know that Outlook often
    uses
    the IE engine for processing html messages. So would patching IE
    protect
    Outlook?

    Thanks!
       - Kurt

    -----
    NTBugtraq Editor's Note:

    Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is
    configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the
    message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message.
    This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages
    posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster,
    you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it
    in your TO: field.
    -----

    -----
    NTBugtraq Editor's Note:

    Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field.
    -----

  • Next message: Jeffrey Thomas: "SANS has release a GDI scanning tool"
    • Quantcast