Re: [Vmyths.com ALERT] Hysteria predicted for 'JPEG Processor' vulne

From: Mike Hays (cpunews_at_HOTMAIL.COM)
Date: 09/16/04

  • Next message: Joe Dance: "Resolution re: SUS server fails to synchronize with Windows Update servers"
    Date:         Thu, 16 Sep 2004 13:27:38 -0400
    To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
    
    

    While I applaud your efforts at encouraging everyone to remain calm
    regarding the GDI+ vulnerability, and I am especially thankful that you
    clarified that the problem is with GDI+ and _not_ with JPEG, I have problems
    with one of your suggestions:

    "Vmyths urges you to download the patch, install it, and get on with your
    life."

    The problem is that there is no single patch for this vulnerability. That
    makes it difficult for companies to implement the patch and audit for
    compliance (not to mention the home user). That in turn makes this
    vulnerability potentially valuable as an attack vector. It may not even
    make a huge splash at the onset, but it could be around for a while, and a
    malicious user could see that as an opportunity.

    So, while the sky isn't falling, I think Microsoft did a poor job on the
    release of this security bulletin. I think they need to do the following to
    correct this:

    *There needs to be a Microsoft tool that really detects and reports on the
    presence of the vulnerability, the vulnerable application when it can, and
    the path to the DLL in third party application program folders when it can't
    (it would be nice if it could run remotely and from a command line, but even
    a interactive version would be helpful)

    *Microsoft should release a single patch that corrects all vulnerable
    Microsoft applications at once (and it should not be buried in service packs
    that require additional testing before deployment)

    *A knowledge base article should also be set up to list third party
    applications that are independently susceptible to this problem with links
    to the vendor's site for a patch or corrected version of the application.
    (The web page for this article should be referenced by the detection tool if
    it finds third party vulnerable applications)

    As this is a critical vulnerability, and Microsoft deems it as suchl, they
    need to invest the resources in making it as easy as possible to correct the
    issue upfront. Otherwise we could end up with another SQL Slammer.

    Sincerely,
    Mike Hays CISSP
    cpunews@hotmail.com

    -----
    NTBugtraq Editor's Note:

    Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field.
    -----


  • Next message: Joe Dance: "Resolution re: SUS server fails to synchronize with Windows Update servers"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [Full-disclosure] Security Alert: Unofficial IE patches appear on internet
      ... created by a vulnerability is as serious as this case and the available ... Microsoft will be inclined strongly against holding on to this patch. ... Microsoft often have patches ready but wait for the corporate known ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: NT4 patch for MS00-084??
      ... there is no such patch to be found on the technet security ... > "Microsoft has released a patch that eliminates a security ... > vulnerability in Microsoft® Indexing Services for Windows 2000. ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: ??? MS03-040 Cumulative Patch for Internet Explorer (828750) ???
      ... > Does it fix this object data tag vulnerability or not? ... > This is a flaw in Microsoft's primary contribution to HTML, ... > only **doesn't** fix that vulnerability, Microsoft dont even acknowledge ... > The patch addresses the vulnerabilities by ensuring that Internet ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Virus or from Microsoft?
      ... this communication is being sent to all of our Microsoft ... to alert you of this Security Bulletin. ... and a patch regarding a vulnerability in the ... likelihood of the exploitation of this vulnerability. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: Is this email the real thing?
      ... >>Microsoft customers to alert you of this Security ... >>critical security bulletin and a patch ... >>likelihood of the exploitation of this vulnerability. ...
      (microsoft.public.security)