Re: PING: Outlook 2003 Spam

http-equiv_at_excite.com
Date: 06/04/04

  • Next message: Steven M. Christey: "Re: Russ Cooper's AusCERT Presentation on MS Security Bulletins" 
    Date:         Fri, 4 Jun 2004 21:06:50 -0000
To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM

    I think Mark might be onto something both the vml and the copies
    of named files in the temp folder no longer appear to occur:

    http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10323
    http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10307

    Those notes are dated 10th and 11th May. On the machine they no
    longer work on, we have a couple XP so-called 'patches' from
    14th May and 17th May with 3 or 4 office update folders with
    files created on 17th May as well.

    How's that for service. Quick, silent patching ! No need to
    bother anyone ! Well done lads. You see you can do it. When the
    resultant bug affects your bread and butter as it were, multiple
    billions of dollars can be thrown at the problem and a fix
    provided under a week. Silently too ! This despite the PR flack
    machine claiming all sorts of nonsense excuses about testing on
    all sorts of machines.

    Bravo to Microsoft ! When they have to they can ! 5 gold stars !

    [unless of course if our little XP test machines are broken and
    we are seeing things]

    "Spencer, Mark" <mspencer@evidentdata.com> said:
      Is it
    possible
    > Microsoft has already patched Outlook 2003

    -----
    NTBugtraq Editor's Note:

    Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you''ll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field.
    -----

  • Next message: Steven M. Christey: "Re: Russ Cooper's AusCERT Presentation on MS Security Bulletins"