Norton Internet Security 2003 blacklist fault?

From: Greg Lawton (gjl_at_PENACASATA.DEMON.CO.UK)
Date: 08/22/03

  • Next message: Gary Flynn: "Re: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS03-036"
    Date:         Fri, 22 Aug 2003 21:12:23 +0100
    To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
    
    

    Hello, all. First time poster on this list - so be gentle!

    I was going to post this in a Symantec newsgroup first, and give them a
    chance to respond - but I took one look at the hundreds of groups that
    they run...

    Basically, Norton Internet Security (tested with the current 2003
    version) has, like any other firewall, an ability to stop access to a
    given site depending on a firewall rule.

    I have discovered that when you enter a rule to block a specific site,
    the software does a regular lookup for the sites IP address at the time
    you enter the rule. (So it can't add sites while you're off line - it
    has to be able to talk to your DNS server). That IP address is used as
    the blacklist target.

    Several worrying problems with this :-

    1) If the blocked site then changes IP address, it's not caught. The
    ruleset will give the name of the site you think it's blocking, but it
    doesn't know it's moved. Since the block runs on IP addresses, that site
    is free to be accessed again.
    2) Because large sites have multiple subdomains, such as www.bbc.co.uk,
    news.bbc.co.uk, this means that just entering bbc.co.uk (don't know why
    you'd want to ban the fine BBC, but it's an example) won't block
    news.bbc.co.uk.

    Basically, it doesn't block on matching the URL typed with the ruleset,
    it blocks on a blacklist of IP addresses resolved at the time each site
    was added.

    What do you all think?

    oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
    Whatever Happened to Octopus?

    LEGATO RepliStor, formerly known as Octopus, delivers breakthrough
    replication performance that's 5X faster than the competition in an
    independent head-to-head test. Learn how RepliStor uses patented,
    asynchronous, real-time replication, to deliver disaster recovery, data
    distribution and consolidated backups. It is the first replication solution
    to achieve Windows 2003 certification. Get the performance report now.

    http://portal1.legato.com/products/replistor/upgrade.cfm

    oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo


  • Next message: Gary Flynn: "Re: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS03-036"

    Relevant Pages

    • BAD NEWS: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-032
      ... Whatever Happened to Octopus? ... LEGATO RepliStor, formerly known as Octopus, delivers breakthrough ... asynchronous, real-time replication, to deliver disaster recovery, data ...
      (NT-Bugtraq)
    • W2K SP4 bug on DCs
      ... Whatever Happened to Octopus? ... LEGATO RepliStor, formerly known as Octopus, delivers breakthrough ... asynchronous, real-time replication, to deliver disaster recovery, data ...
      (NT-Bugtraq)
    • MS03-32 kills asp.net on XP Pro systems :0-(
      ... Whatever Happened to Octopus? ... LEGATO RepliStor, formerly known as Octopus, delivers breakthrough ... asynchronous, real-time replication, to deliver disaster recovery, data ...
      (NT-Bugtraq)
    • Re: SoBig.F Phase 2 - about to start, or not
      ... Whatever Happened to Octopus? ... LEGATO RepliStor, formerly known as Octopus, delivers breakthrough ... asynchronous, real-time replication, to deliver disaster recovery, data ...
      (NT-Bugtraq)
    • Re: www.windowupdate.com GONE - What about the little people?
      ... Whatever Happened to Octopus? ... LEGATO RepliStor, formerly known as Octopus, delivers breakthrough ... asynchronous, real-time replication, to deliver disaster recovery, data ...
      (NT-Bugtraq)