Re: AV/Spam Alert response messages

From: Alun Jones (alun_at_TEXIS.COM)
Date: 08/21/03

  • Next message: Marc Maiffret: "EEYE: Internet Explorer Object Data Remote Execution Vulnerability"
    Date:         Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:48:28 -0500
    To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
    
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Windows NTBugtraq Mailing List
    > [mailto:NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM] On Behalf Of Russ
    > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:33 AM
    >
    > In this day and age where most virus infected emails are
    > coming from spoofed email addresses, do you really think its
    > prudent to have your AV gateways configured to automatically
    > send notices? Marc Maifrett's email generated over 100
    > automatic responses to the list address, most copied to
    > Marc's address also, and no doubt many more simply returned a
    > warning to Marc's address only.

    I hear what you're saying, particularly in regard to SoBig.F, and with that
    in mind, I'd like to add that this should go beyond system administrators
    setting options to not send out warnings. This should be a hard-coded
    thing. If the software should detect a known virus, it should not send any
    email to the alleged sender unless the virus is known to use the infected
    person's email account for all outgoing messages.

    Part of my job is to send software that my customers have ordered to them.
    Most of these customers request that I send it through email. Of course,
    the software includes an executable or two, and I'm careful to encrypt and
    zip these. One of the big problems I face is that some customers will call
    me back a month after I send the software, and they'll say "where's my
    software?", and I'll reply "we shipped it a month ago, and there were no
    errors reported". After a little exchange that can often be quite rude on
    the customer's behalf, we establish that his mail server must have deleted
    it because, as we all know, most viruses spread by the use of encrypted zip
    files </sarcasm>

    So, there's a valid need to notify someone - either the recipient, or the
    sender, or someone who can analyse the email in question and make a good
    determination. But in the case of a known and identified virus, especially
    where the virus is known to forge "From" addresses, email should not be sent
    to the "From" address. If you must send an email somewhere, send it to the
    recipient.

    I've spent part of this morning arguing with a "tech support" representative
    for an antivirus company, who has been telling me all morning that his
    software includes a setting for the system administrator to tell the scanner
    to "send a message to the sender and recipient of the virus" (his words, not
    mine), and I've been trying to persuade him that this option is not doing
    what it is supposed to be doing, it's doubling the fun on the behalf of the
    virus writer.

    If list managers are told "don't send email unless you know the recipient is
    the person who claimed to opt in to the list", then shouldn't this also be
    true of virus scanners? Don't send email unless you know the recipient is
    the infected party.

    Alun.
    ~~~~

    --
    Texas Imperial Software   | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email
    1602 Harvest Moon Place   | alun@texis.com.
    Cedar Park TX 78613-1419  | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers.
    Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.
    oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
    Whatever Happened to Octopus?
    LEGATO RepliStor, formerly known as Octopus, delivers breakthrough
    replication performance that's 5X faster than the competition in an
    independent head-to-head test. Learn how RepliStor uses patented,
    asynchronous, real-time replication, to deliver disaster recovery, data
    distribution and consolidated backups. It is the first replication solution
    to achieve Windows 2003 certification. Get the performance report now.
    http://portal1.legato.com/products/replistor/upgrade.cfm
    oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
    

  • Next message: Marc Maiffret: "EEYE: Internet Explorer Object Data Remote Execution Vulnerability"

    Relevant Pages

    • Bobax.C
      ... Other files containing the virus have been ... W32.Bobax.C is a worm that exploits both the LSASS ... While this threat may execute on Windows 95/98/Me/Server ... Virus Definitions * ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: Pixelsrvr.exe wont load on bootup
      ... Sounds like you got yourself a virus,. ... Adds the following line to the [windows] section of the Win.ini file: ... antivirus products, including the Symantec AntiVirus and Norton AntiVirus ... Disabling System Restore ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.video)
    • Re: HELP ON XP RE-INSTALLATION...
      ... > IF I REINSTALL XP ON MY COMPUTER HELP IF I HAVE A VIRUS THAT I CANT ... Don't have an AntiVirus software? ... There are more applications you may need to run to completely clean your ... It will probably save you time and effort in re-installing Windows XP ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: RE-INSTALLING XP
      ... > IF I REINSTALL XP ON MY COMPUTER HELP IF I HAVE A VIRUS THAT I CANT ... Don't have an AntiVirus software? ... There are more applications you may need to run to completely clean your ... It will probably save you time and effort in re-installing Windows XP ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: Big Bertha Thing blogs
      ... Big Bertha Thing moisture ... but Windows is still down. ... It looks like I picked up a macro virus off a wordperfect attachment ... How can we hold this vision dearer than Thee. ...
      (sci.chem)