Re: Administrivia #35466 - NetCraft IIS insecurity statistics
From: Russ (Russ.Cooper@RC.ON.CA)Date: 11/09/01
- Previous message: Russ: "NTBugtraq Proposal for The Responsible Disclosure Forum"
- Maybe in reply to: Russ: "Administrivia #35466 - NetCraft IIS insecurity statistics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <E9A01F52DC939448BBDE44ED2E1C468F23CCFF@muskie.rc.on.ca> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 07:47:59 -0500 From: Russ <Russ.Cooper@RC.ON.CA> Subject: Re: Administrivia #35466 - NetCraft IIS insecurity statistics To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
I obviously triggered a nerve, probably more due to my wording than my lack
of a High School education...;-]
That said, consensus seems to be;
1. NetCraft didn't do any extrapolation, that was done by others reporting
on NetCraft's survey results.
2. The sample size ("several hundred") could be adequate for extrapolation,
it depends on whether or not the sample was RANDOMLY chosen from the greater
population.
3. The Web Server Security dataset clearly wasn't randomly chosen. It was
100% of the IIS boxes they did the security tests on (100% of the subset
they did security testing on that were IIS).
Ergo, extrapolation of the results should not be done, and isn't
statistically representative of the IIS servers on the 'net. Each person can
decide for themselves whether the boxes tested should or shouldn't have been
clean at the time they were being tested.
NetCraft should add a question to their process which asks the owner of the
box to rate the security of the box they're having tested prior to the
tests. If everyone requesting the test thinks their box is secure, the test
results mean one thing...if they all think their boxes are insecure already,
the results have a different meaning.
Cheers,
Russ - NTBugtraq Editor
- Previous message: Russ: "NTBugtraq Proposal for The Responsible Disclosure Forum"
- Maybe in reply to: Russ: "Administrivia #35466 - NetCraft IIS insecurity statistics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|