Re: NTFS inherited permissions bug on W2K
From: Fernando Trias (fernando@PEDESTALSOFTWARE.COM)Date: 10/12/01
- Previous message: Jeremy Epstein: "Re: NTFS inherited permissions bug on W2K"
- Maybe in reply to: Sam Greenfield: "NTFS inherited permissions bug on W2K"
- Next in thread: Grant, Lynn: "Re: NTFS inherited permissions bug on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <KNEGIDANFDPNMBEIOJMAMEFHEBAA.fernando@pedestalsoftware.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:08:47 -0400 From: Fernando Trias <fernando@PEDESTALSOFTWARE.COM> Subject: Re: NTFS inherited permissions bug on W2K To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM
============================================================================
Delivery co-sponsored by GFI Software
============================================================================
LANguard Security Event Log Monitor offer!
Catch hackers red-handed with LANguard S.E.L.M.! Provides intrusion
detection through centralized NT/2000 security event log monitoring.
Extensive reporting identifies all machines being targeted & local users
trying to hack. Download your FREE starter pack today:
http://www.gfisoftware.com/stats/adentry.asp?adv=107&LOC;=1
When we faced this issue in our design of our SecurityExpressions product
which, among its many features, copies/moves files securely, we would up
with a scenario of two categories with various options each. You pick one
option (a, b, or c) in each of #1 and #2 below.
1. Existing entities:
(a) Remove inherited permissions or
(b) Keep inherited permissions
2. Inheritence
(a) Inherit from new parent (remove protection if it's there) or
(b) Protect from inheritance or
(c) If protected, keep it protected; otherwise inherit from new parent.
This scenario allows for all typical requirements. For files that are
secured individually, you choose 1(a) and 2(b). If you are moving files from
a public area into a private area, you choose 1(a) and 2(a). If moving from
a private directory to a public one, but you want to maintain security,
choose 1(b) and 2(b). And so on.
The principal problem is that there is no single behavior that suits all
needs. Windows must ask the user what behavior he/she prefers.
Alternatively, the desired behavior could be encoded in the ACL itself via a
new set of flags. I prefer asking because then the behavior is explicit and
clearly communicated to the user at the time of the copy/move.
- Previous message: Jeremy Epstein: "Re: NTFS inherited permissions bug on W2K"
- Maybe in reply to: Sam Greenfield: "NTFS inherited permissions bug on W2K"
- Next in thread: Grant, Lynn: "Re: NTFS inherited permissions bug on W2K"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|