[Full-disclosure] Using second gpg keyring may be misleading?
- From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:17:49 +0300
There is chance someone exploits this in apt-key...
Attached is a keyring and here is the output:
$rm -rf /home/joro2/.gnupg/ ; gpg --import /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-master-keyring.gpg ; gpg --check-sigs --keyring /tmp/sec3
gpg: imported: 1 (RSA: 1)
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
/home/joro2/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
------------------------------
pub 4096R/3F272F5B 2007-11-09
uid Ubuntu Archive Master Signing Key <ftpmaster@xxxxxxxxxx>
sig!3 3F272F5B 2007-11-09 Ubuntu Archive Master Signing Key <ftpmaster@xxxxxxxxxx>
/tmp/sec3
---------
pub 1024R/B1C08810 2012-06-14
uid kkkkkkk5 <k@k>
sig!3 B1C08810 2012-06-14 [User ID not found]
sig! 3F272F5B 2012-06-14 Ubuntu Archive Master Signing Key <ftpmaster@xxxxxxxxxx>
sig! 3F272F5B 2012-06-14 Ubuntu Archive Master Signing Key <ftpmaster@xxxxxxxxxx>
sub 1024R/0354AE88 2012-06-14
sig! B1C08810 2012-06-14 [User ID not found]
sub 2179R/3F272F5B 2012-06-14
sig! B1C08810 2012-06-14 [User ID not found]
1 signature not checked due to a missing key
$rm -rf /home/joro2/.gnupg/ ; gpg --import /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-master-keyring.gpg ; gpg --no-default-keyring --check-sigs --keyring /tmp/sec3
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: imported: 1 (RSA: 1)
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
/tmp/sec3
---------
pub 1024R/B1C08810 2012-06-14
uid kkkkkkk5 <k@k>
sig!3 B1C08810 2012-06-14 kkkkkkk5 <k@k>
sig! 3F272F5B 2012-06-14 kkkkkkk5 <k@k>
sig! 3F272F5B 2012-06-14 kkkkkkk5 <k@k>
sub 1024R/0354AE88 2012-06-14
sig! B1C08810 2012-06-14 kkkkkkk5 <k@k>
sub 2179R/3F272F5B 2012-06-14
sig! B1C08810 2012-06-14 kkkkkkk5 <k@k>
Attachment:
sec3
Description: Binary data
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Using second gpg keyring may be misleading?
- From: Thor (Hammer of God)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Using second gpg keyring may be misleading?
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] [ MDVSA-2012:091 ] libreoffice
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Using second gpg keyring may be misleading?
- Previous by thread: [Full-disclosure] [ MDVSA-2012:091 ] libreoffice
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Using second gpg keyring may be misleading?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|