Re: [Full-disclosure] Megaupload Anonymous hacker retaliation, nobody wins



On 01/26/2012 03:04 AM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Levente Peres<sheridan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This will give decision makers EXACTLY what they WANT.

Those who have already given up democracy think that way.
Not necessarily. I strongly believe in the principle of democracy. In
fact I'm from a country where people fought and died for it, similar to
the US and many others. And I also hear simple people like me and
politicians alike, talk about it, and cite it over again, but more often
than not, I just don't see it happening. I don't want to get into any
"conspiracy theory" - either one thinks that way or doesn't, but if you
look at the patterns, then let's just say that strong interest groups
somehow always seem to get past these democratic barriers to create
situations in which they can generate profit. Fortunately, most of the
time they still need to play for the public and ask "nicely" first
before they can do whatever they damn well please. But I feel that is
changing. They get more and more bold, for example, just yesterday I
read Chris Dodd saying something like...

“Those who count on ‘Hollywood’ for support need to understand that this
industry is watching very carefully who’s going to stand up for them
when their job is at stake. Don’t ask me to write a check for you when
you think your job is at risk and then don’t pay any attention to me
when my job is at stake.”

... in "plain daylight", on Fox News I believe. Yes, we have such thing
as democracy out there - but we also have self-interest, and this
self-interest also exists in officials, and it can be exploited.

Lately, after Wikipedia and many others stood by the people, peacefully
but with great resolve, public will has won. Not necessarily because
that was the will of the people - to have none of PIPA etc... - but more
likely because we have triggered this protection of "self interest" in
the officials. Quite simply, elected ones got afraid of not being
re-elected, or just going too far and getting into something they cannot
handle with a popular face. They appeared to have no "valid" moral
reason anymore to cooperate with the passing, so they bailed out.

This is what peaceful show of resolve and public will has achieved and
I'm immensely proud of that... I honestly believe that this is a very
effective way to resist if enough people stand behind it, like with the
blackouts. But these interest groups know that officials also have a
mandate to protect "security", which is a largely different matter. If
they can picture it so that security's being violated somehow, and start
making enough noise about "security" and telling people that "you could
be attacked next" as so on, then quite simply, people will start
demanding them to do whatever they wanted to do in the first place. "We
want to be secure, now you are our officials, so do whatever needs to be
done!" Not all people of course... not everyone will react this way. But
just enough to allow them to move on, the "majority", or so they will
make it appear trough mainstream media. That way they can proceed
without loosing chance for re-election, in fact they may even be lauded
as heros who can make hard decisions. A nice abuse of democratic
principles. On the other hand, if this "threat" can be pumped up big
enough to warrant an "attack on the country", then it's even worse. Then
they won't need you to agree to/with anything, they can do whatever they
want to do by definition of "protecting national security". This is why
I believe that going to cyberwar (essentially: hard violence) over this
or anything else is counter-effective.

Levente

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Keeping the Flame Alive
    ... of their country or their fellow citizens, or set much store by democracy, ... Fighting for their individual rights and the rights of others ... Even though corrupt court officials eventually thwarted their ... employers and local government officials, encouraging the former to show more ...
    (talk.politics.tibet)
  • UDD detains officials; DTV goes black
    ... Breaking news UDD detains officials; ... officials have been detained by the United Front for Democracy against ... Dictatorship (UDD) protesters at Government House, ... Mr Niphon was hurt after the anti-government protesters broke into the ...
    (soc.culture.thai)
  • Re: U.S. officials rethink hopes for Iraq democracy
    ... top U.S. officials in Iraq still talk about preserving the country's ... government that functions and can bring security. ... non-Western countries where democracy isn't a tradition. ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: Why Space Empires?
    ... then your "David saying ..." ... AIUI, the individual officials ... it "not a democracy" to me, especially since they coined the term. ... majority vote of the male citizens who showed up at the assembly. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • U.S. officials rethink hopes for Iraq democracy
    ... BAGHDAD, Iraq -- Nightmarish political realities in Baghdad are ... prompting American officials to curb their vision for democracy in Iraq. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)