Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:08:17 -0500
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:55:28 EST, Shyaam Sundhar said:
My question(s) would be: why are people sloppy by nature when it comes to
security? Why is security still considered as a blanket as opposed to the core
of any system?
In most shops, the level of competence is barely sufficient to make sure that
the payroll system prints a check for every employee with the correct number on
it. Trying to keep the system running *and* secure is beyond their competence
level, so you have to choose one - running or secure. Most managers will
choose 'running', because if they choose 'secure', *they* don't get a paycheck
either...
(Vastly oversimplified, but that's pretty much it in a nutshell).
Attachment:
pgpEBs2TuLsif.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- From: Shyaam Sundhar
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- From: Ed Carp
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- From: Jeffrey Walton
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- From: Ferenc Kovacs
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- From: Shyaam Sundhar
- [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|