Re: [Full-disclosure] Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default



That was SE linux.
Sent via BlackBerry® from AIS

-----Original Message-----
From: charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:44:30
To: dave bl<db.pub.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default

I suppose the real question is, what is more important, that its linux
or that its secure by default...?


Quoting dave bl <db.pub.mail@xxxxxxxxx>:

On 23 November 2011 21:37, <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If you can't, maybe you can name other, more secure Linux distro in
which your 10 ways do not work.

OpenBSD? :P

What a great choice for a secure linux distribution ;)





-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



Relevant Pages