Re: [Full-disclosure] Oracle NoSQL Directory Traversal
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:22:19 -0400
On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:43:46 -0000, Ryan Dewhurst said:
It doesn't matter what file was included. The problem is that a local
file can be included, irrelevant to the choice of file.
Yes, but you won't get Oracle to do squat about a directory traversal bug that
coughs up a world-readable file - especially when it's a program they don't
even pretend is secure. Getting it to give up the goods on a file that's
supposed to be sensitive *might* get their attention.
That, and it *does* matter what file was included - if only for the lulz value. ;)
Attachment:
pgpm5QYR7q37U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Oracle NoSQL Directory Traversal
- From: Buherátor
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Oracle NoSQL Directory Traversal
- From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Oracle NoSQL Directory Traversal
- From: Ed Carp
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Oracle NoSQL Directory Traversal
- From: Ryan Dewhurst
- [Full-disclosure] Oracle NoSQL Directory Traversal
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] How not to deal with a vulnerability in your code
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] How not to deal with a vulnerability in your code
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Oracle NoSQL Directory Traversal
- Index(es):