Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Benji <me@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:27:16 +0100
No, you are wrong.
Either; the vpn provider complied with court order, or they face the legal
ramifications of not doing so. User location is irrelevant.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:04 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
indeed :)_______________________________________________
but, it is how a proper anon person would operate, well, tht is how i once
did...
anyhow, it is to broad, and, yes, i qwould never believe in bulletproof,
unless i have used it maybe, for 10yrs, thru 10 botnets ;P wich, is very
rare but funnily, possible.
webhosters, are even more corrupt and better at hiding data.. face it, if
the vpn provider had not shat themself, then it would be a non story.
On 29 September 2011 23:00, Benji <me@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
'Abuse' emails and court orders are very different.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
err, you are limited in those countries dude... id really checkup on that
... maybe some but, yea i agree, i dont think any hosting is anon, but, i
sure know i have kept an anon dedis in past, and was VERY easy to avoid
handing anything over. Unless they had personally seized from my company, i
was allowed to basically get away with, and if i want to, again, could do
the same 'anonymously' and, indeed keep those details, away.
it is not frigin hard dude, where did Yyou get the idea, that is not hard
to move a user around boxes :P
and rename them, etc etc etc, always change ipv6 tunnels... there is
somany ways, you obv have not ran a dedicated server in a company
environment coz boi, they hide nets on legit hostin now, legit apparently*
companies...and they do it using those simple means, and, even show logs of
them 'removing and deleting' files of the apprent 'bad user' , this is, a
whole different level than even needing to deal with cops.. so, you are
scared too much by laws wich can be smokescreened.
Run a dedis, or simply ask a admin, howmany abuse they get, and howmany
users they actually rm ;)
you would want this service, on your vps ?
i surely wouldnt,. i know, with me, if i offer anon, you stay damn anon,
if you bring cops to MY HOUSE, then i may have to try and, simply keep my
darn data secure ey ?
how about that ?
simple methods, defeat simple plans benji.
xd
On 29 September 2011 22:53, Benji <me@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes they do. If you buy a server in America for example, even if you are
located in Russia, they are required by federal law to hand over your
details wherever you may reside. I dont know where you've obtained this idea
that they can't.
Just because something is advertised as 'anonymous' doesnt mean it's 'so
anonymous you can break the law' and anyone using a EU/US-related country to
do this is either stupid or naive.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:50 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They advertised as anonymous VPN to 'everyone'.
Then, that would mean, especially NOT locally, thats something wich is
also, subject to federal laws though so, in its own country, the provider
may have to, nomatter whats advertised, BUT outside of country customers,
should not be handed over.
isp's here dont do it, and havent, for like 20 yrs, they also do not
take down people,issue nor execute other peoples 'takedown orders', there is
many reasons for this but basically, they loose money from it.
Anyhow, in UK, you maybe right, but outside of there, then, they should
have maybe not advertised as anononymous vpn services for everyone and
anyone. thats obvious crap we know now.
anyhow, cheers,
xd
On 29 September 2011 22:45, Benji <me@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Im sorry, why is it 'worrying' that a vpn provider that was a UK
business and was located in the UK, is subject to UK law?
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Darren Martyn <
d.martyn.fulldisclosure@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Again, I hope this does not fail to send.
The reasoning behind the "Pure Elite" recruitment channel was A: to
recruit some talented people (and, by all accounts, there were some talented
programmers there) and B: development and idle talk. Now more interesting
was the reasoning behind the name - by putting the developers and coders and
potential recruits in a channel named "Pure Elite", it was essentially an
ego boost for the new guys, made them feel valued, etc, when in fact most
were but pawns to be used (IMHO).
This co-operation between VPN providers and LEO, while being nothing
new - remember how hushmail caved in - is indeed worrying for those of us
who are privacy advocates as well as security researchers.
On a more direct note, Laurelei, do not presume that you know all
there is to know about them. Doing so would be foolish. (Now don't go
assuming that I hate you, I bear you bugger all ill-will, etc).
Good day.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Laurelai Storm <
laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Its all good dude. What really concerns me is that vpn providers
might give over logs to oppressive regemes. TOR is starting to look better
and better.
On Sep 27, 2011 11:40 PM, "GloW - XD" <doomxd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
never did... was only for one buttcheek kid that i was alittlepissed and
thinking things wich, prolly were wrong at the time...hopefully it
I am adult enough to apologise for what happened back then, and
is just, cool.wrote:
:)
cheers, your loved by many, you just have many trollers to :sp
take care ,
xd
On 28 September 2011 14:32, Laurelai Storm <laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
even know
Im suprised, someone on the internet who *doesn't * hate me :p
On Sep 27, 2011 11:29 PM, "GloW - XD" <doomxd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Laurelai ,
Oh i agree it is still a terrible precedent to be set.. I dont
justwhere, legally, i stand anymore...
It is rather disturbing, nomatter WHO it was laurela.
I am all for the hatred against the VPN provs, and this is not
privacy, in myhappening here, and i made a BIG statement about this, and
hugechannel on efnet, first as i saw it.
Then saw a torrentfreak feed,of someone who was an owner of a
by thetorrent
site, was handed to authorities, not by the hoster, no... but
and whatfrigging payment handler, ie paypal or alertpay most likely.
This is not good, it makes a grey could now over what is 'anon'
places likeisnt. and thats a bad thing for us all.
To much fraud is causing this, thats plain and simple.Abusing
politics, whomSony, and, major banks, only make the authorities turn to
think thisin
turn can bully with federal and state laws of ANY country, i
was apartis
the dangerous part wich is affecting lulzsec members or whoever
not aloneof
it, and, i mean efnet is no recruiting grounds for decent hkrs.
Simple as that, you know it, maybe thru word of mouth ok, but
now..and, thatby
being in channels but that network, is one federal hideout
realising,is
every channel, if it is not being spied (yea they have a module
m_spychannel.c or similar, wich, they actually had without
runningasked
a friend, to code for them.
This was rejected by me/her,but i believe they have the module
it :s looknow.
So, what was to stop them adding theyre own hidden spy mode to
drinemon and aat
what they did to my old channel #haqnet, they introduced
out withbunch of other things, when it could have been simply worked
is mutualwords.. but anyhow, i will not brood on the past, i hope this
expect theLaurelai, I have nothing bad to say about you, and in turn,
notsame.
Respect for respect dear.
I do agree with you about the situation and, as you can see, am
oneholding
9undisclosed) crappy things wich happened along time ago, over
wantidiotic
kid, on efnet, whom now i know you do not associate with. So, i
prevail andthat,
to be laid rest now.. please.
And, we can only hope that the greater common sense will
way, wetherhopefully, places will be forced to proove anonymity in some
peoplesthat be by showing people email interaction with requester's of
for VPN, Iinfo, or anything simple even, wich would be then a standard
legal anddo
not use them but, if i bought anonymous vpn, id expect exactlythat,without
political interaction and grey areas about who and what is now
wrote:not
legal on the internet, on chatrooms, and on even websites.
ok, thats plenty, cheers!
xd
On 28 September 2011 13:41, Laurelai <laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
hma.
On 9/27/2011 10:10 PM, sandeep k wrote:
Lolz members was really insane ,i m not why to use that crapy
wrote:On Sep 27, 2011 8:36 PM, "Ferenc Kovacs" <tyra3l@xxxxxxxxx>
doomxd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:yeah, and usually the same goes for calling others "kids" ;)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:30 PM, GloW - XD <
thing... why#pure-elite , rofl... yes indeed :P
hehe... nice story tho...funny about the elite channel
seeing asdo
ppl
tag themselves as elite? usually when they are not...
ohwell, thats efnut :s (irc sucks)
xd
On 27 September 2011 19:03, Darren Martyn
<d.martyn.fulldisclosure@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hope this sends correctly, new email client and all... But
bending overit
is
an international investigation many people have been
VPN's ofbackwards
to assist LEO on this. HMA and perfect privacy were the
#pure-elite channelchoice
for
them it would appear, oh, and he was part of the
"Part ofon
that
IRC server, and hence, considered by LEO and others as
noloader@xxxxxxxxx>laurelai@xxxxxxxxxxxxLulzSec".
TL;DR, this is nothing new.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Laurelai Storm <
wrote:
And the guy wasnt even a part of lulzsec
On Sep 26, 2011 10:37 PM, "Jeffrey Walton" <
ivanhec@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Ivan . <
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/VPN-provider-helped-track-down-alleged-LulzSec-member-1349666.htmlwrote:
looks asThough HMA claims they complied with a court order, it
the FBIif
they facilitated a law enforcement request. The US and
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.htmlhave
no
jurisdiction in the UK.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.htmlHosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.htmlHosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.htmlHosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.htmlHosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.htmlHosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
recruitmentHosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
From my understanding they used the channel as a possible
, i findground, though only 6 people were officially a part of lulzsec
channelit
disturbing that law enforcement considers being in an irc
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.htmltantamount
to being a part of lulzsec.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Ivan .
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Jeffrey Walton
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Laurelai Storm
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Darren Martyn
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: GloW - XD
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Ferenc Kovacs
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: sandeep k
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Laurelai
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: GloW - XD
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Laurelai Storm
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: GloW - XD
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Laurelai Storm
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Darren Martyn
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Benji
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: xD 0x41
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Benji
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: xD 0x41
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: Benji
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- From: xD 0x41
- [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] VPN provider helped track down alleged LulzSec member
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|