Re: [Full-disclosure] Python ssl handling could be better...
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:09:35 -0500
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:39:49 EST, Charles Morris said:
I've had this conversation at many different times with different
people over the years. <snip>
If you tell a lie enough times.....
Took long enough to Godwin this thread. ;)
Attachment:
pgpGFrXMmW5dP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- References:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Python ssl handling could be better...
- From: Charles Morris
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Python ssl handling could be better...
- From: Tim
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Python ssl handling could be better...
- From: Charles Morris
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Python ssl handling could be better...
- From: Tim
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Python ssl handling could be better...
- From: Charles Morris
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Python ssl handling could be better...
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] [ MDVSA-2011:043 ] libtiff
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Mutt: failure to check server certificate in SMTP TLS connection
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Python ssl handling could be better...
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Python ssl handling could be better...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|