[Full-disclosure] Fwd: HBGary Mirrors?
- From: "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" <cal.leeming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:50:15 +0000
Sorry, when I say eligible, I mean "which server would they be allowed to
take down by law?".
I'm not too hot on the laws of encryption, but I'm sure there is something
which states that hosting encrypted files are not illegal, it's distributing
the key which allows you to gain access to those fails, which is actually
*DISCLAIMER: I don't know if the above is true or not, so apologies if I got
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:46 PM, ck <c.kernstock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I go with the server hosting the files since the key should be_______________________________________________
significant smaller than the files and therefor much easier to mirror.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]
So here's a thought.hosted
If illegally distributed files (such as this one) were encrypted and
on one server, and the key hosted on another, which server would
be eligible for take down?
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Vulnerability in reCAPTCHA for Drupal
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: HBGary Mirrors?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] HBGary Mirrors?
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: HBGary Mirrors?