Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- From: Rohit Patnaik <quanticle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:16:09 -0600
It depends entirely on how you define "flawed". As I stated earlier, the
goal of the prosecutor is not some abstract ideal of justice. It is a
conviction. Anything they can do within the law to convict you is fair
game. Using statements that you put on your hard drive certainly falls
under those rules, regardless of what the original intent was.
-- Rohit Patnaik
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
So to the point, the techniques of forensic examiners were flawed from_______________________________________________
day one given that any text/evidence found on your computer is NOT
NECESSARILY yours! Does that break digital forensics........?
oops.................
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- From: Bipin Gautam
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- From: Michael Holstein
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- From: Bipin Gautam
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- From: Rohit Patnaik
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- From: Bipin Gautam
- [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Disk wiping -- An alternate approach?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
