Re: [Full-disclosure] Slander of security researcher n3td3v
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:17:08 -0400
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:43:45 CDT, someone lawyer said:
Comment lead to the belief list wants to mock my client.
Please note that "the list" is merely an aggregation of names, and as such, is
no more able to "want to mock your client" than your phone book may wish to do
so. And even if you interpret "the list" as the collection of subscribers,
that *still* doesn't work, because the subscribers on the full-disclosure list
are famous for not agreeing about much of anything. If they agreed that your
client deserved mocking, it would be the first thing they've been in agreement
on.
But you might want to have a chat with your phone book, see how it feels
about your client.
Attachment:
pgpiHKrqluspU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Slander of security researcher n3td3v
- From: John Dietz
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Slander of security researcher n3td3v
- References:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Slander of security researcher n3td3v
- From: someone lawyer
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Slander of security researcher n3td3v
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Slander of security researcher n3td3v
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hindustan Times epaper Server Hacked
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Alleged Slander of an assumed security researcher
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Slander of security researcher n3td3v
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|