Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-disclosure Anti virus installations on Windows servers
- From: mbs <mbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 09:15:23 -0400
|
This debate has been interesting, if light on practical advice. Let me clarify my question. First, I do not own the server in question. I did not install the operating system in question. I did not make that business decision. According to http://news.netcraft.com/
Thirty percent of servers run windows. Some of you will laugh at someone who has to protect a windows server, and would suggest rebuilding from the ground up. Obviously my client would disagree. One person suggested Kaspersky, and I have it running at the moment, it seems to be working as intended. Am I missing the point? T Biehn wrote: The example provides an easy to concoct scenario where perhaps anti-virus software might be employed to great benefit where the |
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Anti virus installations on Windows servers
- From: Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Anti virus installations on Windows servers
- From: T Biehn
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Anti virus installations on Windows servers
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] “Cross-Site Scripting” vulnerability in MyBB 1.4.5
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] [ MDVSA-2009:105 ] memcached
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Anti virus installations on Windows servers
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-disclosure Anti virus installations on Windows servers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|