[Full-disclosure] DNS and Checkpoint
- From: imipak <imipak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:00:39 +0100
Hello everyone,
I've had a report from someone with clue (and tcpdump) that a properly
functioning DNS resolver that correctly uses randomised source ports
magically becomes vulnerable once the traffic's passed through a
Checkpoint firewall, where Dan Kaminsky's tool shows:
x.y.z.155:56978 TXID=712
x.y.z.155:56979 TXID=45713
x.y.z.155:56980 TXID=63532
x.y.z.155:56981 TXID=7243
x.y.z.155:56982 TXID=17620
(note the incrementing port numbers.)
Can anyone else confirm this behaviour?
Checkpoint are one of the dozens of vendors listed on the CERT
advisory as "Status: Unknown"
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/MIMG-7ECL6B
They do have an advisory up:
http://www.checkpoint.com/defense/advisories/public/2008/cpai-01-Jul.html
I don't have the login needed to read the whole thing, but the front
page just says:
"Protection provided by:
VPN-1: * NGX R65
* NGX R62
* NGX R61
* NGX R60
[...etc, etc...] "
cheers
=i
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] DNS and Checkpoint
- From: Ray P
- Re: [Full-disclosure] DNS and Checkpoint
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] New round of SSH scan IP's
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Zone Alarm Firewall users without Internet after MS patch (MS08-037)
- Previous by thread: [Full-disclosure] Trixbox 2.6.1 and below, remote root shell through local file inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] DNS and Checkpoint
- Index(es):