Re: [Full-disclosure] The intelligence services compete for Dominance
- From: n3td3v <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:04:54 +0100
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Ureleet <ureleet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
if you were, you wouldnt admit it.
Something you miss dude, i'm not an employee of the secret
intelligence service, but that doesn't mean I can't call you a *** and
say you're banned from UK.
"Its not what you know, its who you know, but when you have both its damn good."
Alright?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] The intelligence services compete for Dominance
- From: n3td3v
- Re: [Full-disclosure] The intelligence services compete for Dominance
- From: Ureleet
- Re: [Full-disclosure] The intelligence services compete for Dominance
- From: n3td3v
- Re: [Full-disclosure] The intelligence services compete for Dominance
- From: Ureleet
- [Full-disclosure] The intelligence services compete for Dominance
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] The intelligence services compete for Dominance
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] DEF CON 16 Retro Announcement! Back to Bang!
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] The intelligence services compete for Dominance
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] The intelligence services compete for Dominance
- Index(es):
Loading