Re: [Full-disclosure] Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!!
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:32:30 -0500
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:13:48 EST, "Randal T. Rioux" said:
OpenVMS is less than 40% Blissful...
Obviously, it's migrated over the years. Back in the late 80's when it
was at its most prevalent (and before it got 'Open' attached to it - we're
talking Big Grey Wall and Big Orange Wall era here), it was pretty heavily
Bliss32..
Security relevance: UNHACKABLE! <grin>
WANK! (The old-timers will know what that means, and it's not what you newbies
think... ;)
Attachment:
pgpQLizl3oADv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!!
- From: Line Noise
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!!
- From: reepex
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!!
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!!
- From: Randal T. Rioux
- [Full-disclosure] Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!!
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] QuietMove ( D - )
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Providers - Exposed] QuietMove ( D - )
- Previous by thread: [Full-disclosure] Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!!
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Was secreview crap - now OpenVMS!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
