Re: [Full-disclosure] AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dll Multiple Buffer Overflows
- From: Elazar Broad <elazarb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:05:08 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
After some more analysis by Carsten Eiram @ Secunia, this is NOT exploitable. I would like to apologize for the hasty post. SecurityFocus, please update bid 27026 to reflect the fact that at most, this can just crash the browser.
Elazar
-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
Sent: Dec 26, 2007 1:28 AM
To: reepex <reepex@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Elazar Broad <elazarb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dll Multiple Buffer Overflows
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:53:29 CST, reepex said:
How does a bunch of 'A's prove something is exploitable?
If a bunch of A's causes the EIP to end up as x'41414141', it's 95% of the
way to being an exploit. If it gets you some *other* crash, it's probably
at least 30% to 40% of the way to an exploit.
Go back and read the analysis of the NTP buffer overflow from a number of years
back. Truly a classic - they managed to leverage a *one byte* overflow into
a complete and total rooting of the box.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] rIP BETA - reverse IP tool
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Buffer-overflow in Extended Module Player 2.5.1
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dll Multiple Buffer Overflows
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] AOL YGP Picture Editor YGPPicEdit.dll Multiple Buffer Overflows
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|