Re: [Full-disclosure] Hushmail == Narqz
- From: "Peter Dawson" <slash.pd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:17:04 -0500
"We both agree Hushmail deserves credit for its frank and open
replies<http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/hush_klp.pdf>(.pdf).
Such candor is hard to come by these days, especially since most
ISPs won't even tell you how long they hold onto your IP address or if they
sell your web-surfing habits to the highest bidders."
Did HushMail inform their users that their emails were goin to be handed
over to government agencies ??
Yeah it kewl to be nice to the MSM and Fed's but what about the user (s) ??
/pd
On Nov 8, 2007 1:43 PM, Paul Melson <pmelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/11/encrypted-e-mai.html_______________________________________________
I thought it seemed a little quiet on fd today. :-)
PaulM
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Hushmail == Narqz
- From: Paul Melson
- [Full-disclosure] Hushmail == Narqz
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200711-11 ] Nagios Plugins: Two buffer overflows
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Gmail 0day
- Previous by thread: [Full-disclosure] Hushmail == Narqz
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hushmail == Narqz
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
