Re: [Full-disclosure] full-disclosure@hushmail.com
- From: "worried security" <worriedsecurity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:36:03 +0100
On 10/13/07, Richard Golodner <rgolodner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
Why don't you keep this offline between you and full-disclosure? I know
Valdis and he does not give a damn about any of this sophomoric stuff. When
you post legitimate security information your credibility is increased as
well as the amount of respect you receive amongst the security community.
Take this as friendly advice and nothing more. You should not threaten to
play games as you may not be aware of who is reading this stuff. I know NSA,
Interpol and FBI personnel who read this but will never reveal themselves,
but you expose yourself to possible investigation by making threats. And
that is never a good idea.
Most sincerely, Richard
Golodner
i haven't broken the law, so it doesn't matter who is reading the list.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] full-disclosure@hushmail.com
- From: Dude VanWinkle
- Re: [Full-disclosure] full-disclosure@hushmail.com
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] full-disclosure@hushmail.com
- From: worried security
- [Full-disclosure] full-disclosure@hushmail.com
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] Clients buffer-overflow in Live for Speed 0.5X10
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] How to Handle ISPs Who Turn a Blind Eye to Criminal Activity?
- Previous by thread: [Full-disclosure] full-disclosure@hushmail.com
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] full-disclosure@hushmail.com
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|