Re: [Full-disclosure] Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable if breached?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

None of you are lawyers.

SHUT UP VLADIS.

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:44:08 -0400 Troy <gimmespam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/10/07, Ray P <sixsigma98@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Would the _intended_ recipient have a case against the sender
for
contractual failure to protect confidential information (or
whatever) if the
_un_intended recipient posts it somewhere or otherwise discloses
its
contents?


I'm surprised we don't see more disclaimers with a copyright
statement in
them. I would think that using copyright law as an argument
against
unauthorized distribution of an email would stand a better chance
in court
than a non-binding disclaimer at the bottom of the message.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
Charset: UTF8
Version: Hush 2.5

wpwEAQECAAYFAkcOMFIACgkQ+dWaEhErNvSA6gP/Tgggjw8KZNPI9M33XtjfyvBS5URq
kRafaMsPfvDcKsRcaNB30zhou3Me1VVG2LuwchOhh1vIss0aPzT8Bq7lgULZiKqOxX19
/L8xfYgHptayeqrNqSYMg4lsl2J/Q1gQTvWf4EPkk+WcakChTuCJdzA/zZfuAIsTTihY
bjtJ+Yg=
=fqcX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [Full-disclosure] Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable if breached?
    ... I would think that using copyright law as an argument against ... unauthorized distribution of an email would stand a better chance in court ... than a non-binding disclaimer at the bottom of the message. ... about a planned hostile corporate takeover, ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Olympic Opening Show
    ... that, under copyright law, the recipient of a letter doesn't actually ... the recipient of a letter actually *does* own the ... physical letter. ... and to charge money for it. ...
    (rec.arts.books.tolkien)