Re: [Full-disclosure] Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable if breached?
- From: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:16:49 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
None of you are lawyers.
SHUT UP VLADIS.
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 01:44:08 -0400 Troy <gimmespam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/10/07, Ray P <sixsigma98@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Would the _intended_ recipient have a case against the sender
contractual failure to protect confidential information (orwhatever) if the
_un_intended recipient posts it somewhere or otherwise disclosesits
I'm surprised we don't see more disclaimers with a copyright
them. I would think that using copyright law as an argument
unauthorized distribution of an email would stand a better chance
than a non-binding disclaimer at the bottom of the message.
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
Version: Hush 2.5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Remote Desktop Command Fixation Attacks
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable if breached?
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Email Disclaimers...Legally Liable if breached?