Re: [Full-disclosure] New term "RDV" is born
- From: Epic <epic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:59:30 -0400
How about SPB - (Stupid Pointless Bullshit)
The noise level on this list is pathetic anymore....
On 9/28/07, Troy <gimmespam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Wouldn't UDV be more appropriate, for unpatched disclosed vulnerability?
The "R" in RDV means recent. I wouldn't consider a two-month old, but still
unpatched, vulnerability to be recent, so I wouldn't really be able to call
it an RDV. I would, however, be able to call it a UDV.
Another option would be EDV, for exploitable disclosed vulnerability, or
even just UV or EV. Why do we need to bring up the point that it's
disclosed? How could we be discussing an undisclosed vulnerability?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] New term "RDV" is born
- From: worried security
- Re: [Full-disclosure] New term "RDV" is born
- From: Troy
- [Full-disclosure] New term "RDV" is born
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] New term "RDV" is born
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Firefox 2.0.0.7 has a very serious calculation bug
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] New term "RDV" is born
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] New term "RDV" is born
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|