Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- From: Peter Besenbruch <prb@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:52:15 -1000
Tremaine Lea wrote:
Sure, it's possible. Possibly Sergio is lazy. As he sent it via
gmail's auth smtp servers and not from webmail, it's just as possible
it happened in his mail client.
And he still could have, and should have edited it.
And all of that aside, who cares? We see signatures like that all
the time on mailing lists. It's pretty obvious they're useless in
this context.
Useless in any context. Sigs. like that are very unprofessional. Even if
I know they are nonsense, such disclaimers come across as mildly bullying.
--
Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- From: Tremaine Lea
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Hash
- From: shadown
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- From: Nick FitzGerald
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- From: Tremaine Lea
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- From: Ronald MacDonald
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- From: Tremaine Lea
- [Full-disclosure] Hash
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|