Re: [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes: DAY THREE
- From: Tõnu Samuel <tonu@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:32:59 +0300
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 23:16 -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
Hashing is not encryption, so flush the notion of "decrypt a hash" from
By definition hashing stuff is also encryption. Not reversible but as
art it is can be categorized under "encryption" :)
But seeing as this is FD and there has been a rash of "Month of Foo"
nonsense, I think someone is just taking the piss and further degrading
the already miniscule SNR of this list. Unless a posted hash is
correlated to the release of some POC or other item of interest, it's
noise.
Actually author who posted those hashes are known man and I am sure if
he posted something, this is cool and I am really sitting and waiting
what he have found. Also I know that he usually provides POC after 6 or
12 months AT LEAST, so do not expect fast info.
Tõnu
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes: DAY THREE
- From: Month of Random Hashes
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes: DAY THREE
- From: Dëêþàñ Çhäkrãvârthÿ
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes: DAY THREE
- From: Brian Dessent
- [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes: DAY THREE
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] [Tool] sqlmap: a blind SQL injection tool (release 0.4)
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes: DAY SIX
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes: DAY THREE
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Month of Random Hashes: DAY THREE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
