Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer Crash
- From: Pavel Kankovsky <peak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 13:23:10 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
So - other than "it has already burned more than N seconds of CPU", what
test do you propose to make?
"It has already consumed N megabytes of memory."
This condition is superfluous from a purely theoretical POV because a
program running for N units of time cannot consume more than N units of
memory (*) but this upper bound is too loose for most programs doing any
useful work.
(*) Or less than log_2(N) units of memory unless it is going to 1. read
more inputs from the outer world or 2. loop forever.
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer Crash
- From: cardoso
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer Crash
- References:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer Crash
- From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer Crash
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] eEye Announcement, CEO blog and addiction
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer Crash
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer Crash
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Internet Explorer Crash
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|