Re: [Full-disclosure] SSH brute force blocking tool

Dear Tavis,

TO> J, you have made an attempt to fix it, but is is not sufficient.
TO> An attacker can still add arbitrary hosts to the deny list.

Can you propose a fix ? Apart from the aggressivness of this thread
I find it interesting to read (from a tech standpoint).



--
http://secdev.zoller.lu
Thierry Zoller
Fingerprint : 5D84 BFDC CD36 A951 2C45 2E57 28B3 75DD 0AC6 F1C7

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Relevant Pages

  • security patches
    ... >of "updates" that claim to fix a problem with a program ... many downloads claim to fix a security ... >problem where "an attacker" can gain control of your ... >Microsoft updates and not "the attacker" gaining control ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] SSH brute force blocking tool
    ... TO> J, you have made an attempt to fix it, but is is not sufficient. ... TO> An attacker can still add arbitrary hosts to the deny list. ... I wouldnt use a shell script to do so, but I suppose you could use lastb ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] More information on ZERT patch for ANI 0day
    ... Gadi Evron wrote: ... it doesn't fix the flawed copy routine. ... I'm thinking that an attacker with write access to %systemroot% probably ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • security patches
    ... of "updates" that claim to fix a problem with a program ... problem where "an attacker" can gain control of your ... Microsoft updates and not "the attacker" gaining control ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • security patches
    ... >of "updates" that claim to fix a problem with a program ... >problem where "an attacker" can gain control of your ... >Microsoft updates and not "the attacker" gaining control ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)