Re: [Full-disclosure] [funsec] tiny PE now at... 304 bytes. Is this the end?
- From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:10:33 -0500
--On Friday, October 20, 2006 08:53:36 -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:33:32 CDT, Gadi Evron said:Gil kept working on tiny PE, and many others started pitching in ideas.
Bah. Pikers. This guy got a Linux executable down to smaller than the
ELF header. 45 bytes.
http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/tiny/teensy.html
Yeahbut, that's equivalent to 450 bytes on Windows, isn't it? :-)
Paul Schmehl (pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Attachment:
p7s6TOJaIxkqd.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] [funsec] tiny PE now at... 304 bytes. Is this the end?
- From: Peter Ferrie
- Re: [Full-disclosure] [funsec] tiny PE now at... 304 bytes. Is this the end?
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] tiny PE now at... 304 bytes. Is this the end?
- From: Gadi Evron
- Re: [Full-disclosure] [funsec] tiny PE now at... 304 bytes. Is this the end?
- From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- [Full-disclosure] tiny PE now at... 304 bytes. Is this the end?
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] tiny PE now at... 304 bytes. Is this the end?
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] "Fire and forget" exploits?
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] [funsec] tiny PE now at... 304 bytes. Is this the end?
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] [funsec] tiny PE now at... 304 bytes. Is this the end?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|