Re: [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- From: Aditya Sood <zeroknock@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:37:15 +0530
Aditya Sood wrote:
Dave "No, not that one" Korn wrote:
Aditya Sood wrote:Hey what ever you suppose to.
This post deals with the googling effects that google provide with itsYou just invented a new phrase that does not exist in any dictionary.
search engine.
What are "googling effects"? And how did you expect everyone else in the
world to know a private phrase you just made up in your own head?
Since in searching algorithms the metacharacters areThat was just plain gibberish.
handled with proper filtering techniques which we have not seen it in
google.Already explanation given to google but i think they are
getting googled not to handled these unexceptional searches.What we
call it.
Explanation:No, those aren't explanations, they are *examples*. You completely forgot
to say anything at all about what is supposed to happen.
Well Only GOOGLE can give the answer.No, only YOU can tell us what on earth you're talking about.
cheers,
DaveK
Well if google has accepted it so better you should too.
Check Down : Response from google"
Well i dont want to say anything more about nerd talk.
Better to accept new stuff ok not stoic
"
T----------------------------
Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Re: [#55295087] Flaw In Google Search Engine
From: security-external@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Fri, April 28, 2006 11:38 amTo: "Aditya Sood" <Aditya@xxxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for your note. Please rest assured that Google never inserts jokes or sends messages by changing theorder of its results. Occasionally, when a particular website is the subject of public attention, other sites beginlinking to it. This may elevate its importance as gauged by our ranking software, which assigns a PageRankvalue based in part on who links to a given page. Higher ranking in Google results may lead to moreawareness, which may lead to more links and so on.One side effect of not using an editorial viewpoint to determine the ranking of results is that anomaliesoccasionally occur. We view such occasions as opportunities for us to learn more about how the web worksand how to improve our algorithms for all searches in the future.Regards,The Google Team
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- From: Andrew Farmer
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- From: Aditya Sood
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- From: Dave \"No, not that one\" Korn
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- From: Aditya Sood
- [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Secunia Research: Microsoft Windows Object Packager Dialog Spoofing
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Googling:Google Meta Bugs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|