Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 19:03:45 -0400
if s00per.pink.h@xor is actually Mischa Spiegelmock i'll eat my two
week old tighty whities on youtoube.com
and about the claim that it is a fake:
The JavaScript issue appears to be a real vulnerability, Window Snyder,
Mozilla's security chief, said after watching a video of the
presentation Saturday night. "What they are describing might be a
variation on an old attack," she said. "We're going to do some
investigating."
i trust a girl named window more than a guy named pink
-JP
On 10/3/06, c0redump@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <c0redump@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Media whores.
----- Original Message -----
From: Pink Hat
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:12 PM
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
Nice to see that a group of idiots can turn a conference into a joke
just as easily as they can a mailing list. Was there any technical
verification from the Toorcon guys before they accepted these asshats
talk?
http://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2006/10/02/update-possible-vulnerability-reported-at-toorcon
The main purpose of our talk was to be humorous.
As part of our talk we mentioned that there was a previously known
Firefox vulnerability that could result in a stack overflow ending up
in remote code execution. However, the code we presented did not in
fact do this, and I personally have not gotten it to result in code
execution, nor do I know of anyone who has.
I have not succeeded in making this code do anything more than cause a
crash and eat up system resources, and I certainly haven't used it to
take over anyone else's computer and execute arbitrary code.
I do not have 30 undisclosed Firefox vulnerabilities, nor did I ever
make this claim. I have no undisclosed Firefox vulnerabilities. The
person who was speaking with me made this claim, and I honestly have
no idea if he has them or not.
I apologize to everyone involved, and I hope I have made everything as
clear as possible.
Sincerely,
Mischa Spiegelmock
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- From: Pink Hat
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- From: Pink Hat
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- From: Pink Hat
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- From: c0redump
- [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] [ MDKSA-2006:179 ] - Updated openssh packages fix DoS vulnerabilities
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox Vulnerabilities FAKED
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|