Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- From: avivra <avivra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:18:12 +0300
Hi,
i.e. I can't afford to buy "specialized" security tools/devices for
"speclialized" attacks unless my company relies heavily on web/content
services.
So, you will buy "specialized" security tools like firewall or
Anti-Virus, but not web content filtering tool?
In our company, we established a information-sharing
network with other security companies. So the real-time exploit-facing
signatures were then subjected to live traffic, honeypots and countless
variants; They seemed to work out pretty well.
I would like to see how your real-time signatures get updated with the
randomization implemented in the new VML metasploit module. Your
"countless" exploit variants will become really innumerable.
The problem is that the signatures are written for the exploit, and
not for the vulnerability.
-- Aviv.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- From: Pukhraj Singh
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- References:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- From: Aviv Raff
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- From: nirvana
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Rothman: Belva's a Joker (was Could InfoSec beWorse than Death?)
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Major UK Bank Web Sites With Serious Security Flaws
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
