Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- From: Alexander Sotirov <asotirov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:51:27 -0700
H D Moore wrote:
Nice work Aviv! All of these methods, along with a few extras, are
implemented in the Metasploit 2.6 version of this module. Last I checked,
not a single AV or IPS could pick it up. This module should work on every
version and service pack of Windows.
http://metasploit.com/projects/Framework/exploits.html#ie_vml_rectfill
You probably mean not a single network-based IPS :-)
There are quite a few host-based IPS systems that definitely stop the standard
Metasploit payloads.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- From: avivra
- Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- From: H D Moore
- [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] VML Exploit vs. AV/IPS/IDS signatures
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|