Re: [Full-disclosure] tar alternative
- From: Aaron Gray <angray@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:55:15 +0100
Tim wrote:
Don't. Untar. Archives. As. Root.
It's that simple.
Or are you also going to complain about the fact that there are tar
versions out there that don't strip a leading / from the archive?
Much fun can be had when you carelessly extract as root, then.
Hello,
Sorry to change the subject slightly here on this thread, but I was
wondering about this before the topic came up.
Given the problems with using the tar format for file distribution, are
there any other simple, non-compressed file-grouping formats out there
that weren't originally designed for backups (e.g. don't contain
usernames, permissions, etc)? Something that can be a drop-in
replacement for tar and thus can integrate with gzip/bzip2 easily?
(Don't even say .zip)
There's probably one out there I'm completely naive about, but I haven't
seen one yet that would be a safer alternative.
cpio ?
It does the job of both tar and gzip. Try an :-
info cpio
As for the Linux Kernel archives, I do not really think there is enough justification for a change in distribution format.
Most kernel coders either use non root account for untar'ing and making the kernel and do a 'sudo make install' anyway.
My 0.02cents worth,
Aaron
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] tar alternative
- From: Tim
- Re: [Full-disclosure] tar alternative
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: Hadmut Danisch
- [Full-disclosure] Re: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter
- [Full-disclosure] Re: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: Hadmut Danisch
- [Full-disclosure] Re: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter
- [Full-disclosure] Re: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: Hadmut Danisch
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- From: Jurjen Oskam
- [Full-disclosure] tar alternative
- From: Tim
- [Full-disclosure] Linux kernel source archive vulnerable
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] AttackAPI (0.7)
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] Info about HTA file [spam or malware ?]
- Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: tar alternative
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] tar alternative
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|