Re: Using Magic Values along with filetype to find malicious files (was RE: [Full-disclosure] Google Malware Search)
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:43:01 -0400
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:27:30 EDT, Dude VanWinkle said:
Hmm, any bets on who is the most infected TLD... :-)
-JP<who is betting on .ru>
"Biggest source of malware" isn't the same as "most infected".
I'm betting on .com/.net (the US cablemodem/DSL section of that),
.ko, and .cn as being the biggest contenders for infected.
Attachment:
pgp2VY44uq6UE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Google Malware Search
- From: H D Moore
- Using Magic Values along with filetype to find malicious files (was RE: [Full-disclosure] Google Malware Search)
- From: Debasis Mohanty
- Re: Using Magic Values along with filetype to find malicious files (was RE: [Full-disclosure] Google Malware Search)
- From: Dude VanWinkle
- [Full-disclosure] Google Malware Search
- Prev by Date: [Full-disclosure] anoNet: Cooperative Chaos
- Next by Date: [Full-disclosure] New CVE identifiers for separate PowerPoint 0-day issues assigned
- Previous by thread: Re: Using Magic Values along with filetype to find malicious files (was RE: [Full-disclosure] Google Malware Search)
- Next by thread: Re: Using Magic Values along with filetype to find malicious files (was RE: [Full-disclosure] Google Malware Search)
- Index(es):
