Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY

Why don't you just "filter" me like "the experts" have told you to do? Or
haven't you worked out the technical background architecture of Outlook and
Thunderbird yet? Figures.

On 3/31/06, php0t <very@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For real, please keep your word.


-----Original Message-----
*From:* full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *n3td3v
*Sent:* Friday, March 31, 2006 9:55 PM
*To:* full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY

This is funny as well, http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID=131539&start=-1&reply=true
I almost choked on my big mac after reading this one, the guy thinks if
you take down a site, the phisher's script doesn't deploy another premade
site straight away on another host. lol, maybe the RSA have miscalculated
the pre plainning and programming of a phishing attack backend before its
carried out. I guess they just thought phishing was down to "dumb
criminals".

On 3/31/06, n3td3v <n3td3v@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Check out this article, and I really did spill my hard earned Starbucks
right down my front when I looked at this article:
http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID=131433&start=-1




_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/