Re: [Full-disclosure] Noise
- From: n3td3v <n3td3v@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:20:22 +0100
And of course, you want to advertise that securiteam.com let you setup a
blog on their domain because they felt sorry for you. I believe theres a
e-mail link on the securiteam.com site for anyone to ask for a blog, its
nothing special. How many corporate systems and networks have you broken
into, just as I thought...none.
On 3/29/06, xyberpix <xyberpix@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Seriously, this list was better with a certain someone not on it, can
we please go back to that way of life again?
xyberpix
Blog: http://blogs.securiteam.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEKvaQ2VKEoIQBZwkRAtzKAKC1Nm61nKmI+kvMO8xdWGfS3stTewCgknu/
lmv5iUrwWtmo9VmqUH9VaT4=
=ohry
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Noise
- From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Noise
- From: xyberpix
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Noise
- References:
- [Full-disclosure] Noise
- From: xyberpix
- [Full-disclosure] Noise
- Prev by Date: RE: [Full-disclosure] Court Order May Violate First Amendment
- Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] Third party patches, a matter of trust by n3td3v
- Previous by thread: [Full-disclosure] Noise
- Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] Noise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
