RE: [Full-disclosure] Court Order May Violate First Amendment

It isn't security threat, it is a misuse of our legal system, an unfair
bias towards the mother. Justice is allegedly impartial, but not in this
case.

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:41 PM
To: zap zoid
Cc: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Court Order May Violate First Amendment

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:08:56 PST, zap zoid said:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,189406,00.html

*yawn* If this violates the First Amendment, so does every single gag order
issued by a judge, prohibiting the people involved from discussing the case.

Anybody else following this story? Thoughts? Is this a security threat
to the United States?

He screwed her, she had a kid. They fought about who got the kid. He lost,
and trash-talked the mom and the family court judges involved. The people
who got trash-talked are trying to get the trash-talking stopped. He turns
around, and trash-talks the way they're trying to get the first round of
trash-talking stopped.

I'm well-known as a member of the tinfoil-helmet brigade, but even *I* am
having a problem seeing how this poses a security threat.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/