Re: [Full-disclosure] urgent info require
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 09/28/05
- Previous message: Bernhard Mueller: "Re: [Full-disclosure] CORE-Impact license bypass"
- In reply to: adnan habib: "[Full-disclosure] urgent info require"
- Next in thread: Ivan .: "Re: [Full-disclosure] urgent info require"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: adnan habib <lifesaver68@hotmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:28:06 -0400
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:20:57 -0000, adnan habib said:
> i want to implement juniper (netscreen) solution in my company ,,, moveover
> i want to replace cyberguard from juniper ... is there any one let me know
> any strong point that will support me in replacement like weakness in
> cyberguard etc,,
First off, a 'Subject: urgent info require' is likely to land you in a lot
of spam filters. 'Subject: Need comparison of netscreen and cyberguard' would
do a lot better.
It sounds like you've already made up your mind to replace the cyberguard
with netscreen - what reason(s) did you already have (so we don't repeat those)?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Bernhard Mueller: "Re: [Full-disclosure] CORE-Impact license bypass"
- In reply to: adnan habib: "[Full-disclosure] urgent info require"
- Next in thread: Ivan .: "Re: [Full-disclosure] urgent info require"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|