RE: [Full-disclosure] PGPNet Upgrade path ?
From: Aditya Deshmukh (aditya.deshmukh_at_online.gateway.strangled.net)
Date: 09/16/05
- Previous message: milw0rm Inc.: "Re: [Full-disclosure] FireFox Host: Buffer Overflow is not just exploitable on FireFox"
- In reply to: Martijn Lievaart: "Re: [Full-disclosure] PGPNet Upgrade path ?"
- Next in thread: Gary E. Miller: "RE: [Full-disclosure] PGPNet Upgrade path ?"
- Reply: Gary E. Miller: "RE: [Full-disclosure] PGPNet Upgrade path ?"
- Reply: Martijn Lievaart: "Re: [Full-disclosure] PGPNet Upgrade path ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'Martijn Lievaart'" <m@rtij.nl> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:37:59 +0530
> > What alternatives are there to pgpnet ?
>
> Have a look at OpenVPN.
Thanks Martijn, but isn`t that a SSL vpn ? And from what I
have read about PGPnet I need a IPSEC VPN that uses
PGP keys to do the auth.
I know for ipsec VPNs I could use the winxp's builtin
But that would require moving all the PGP keys to
X.509 certs.
________________________________________________________________________
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: milw0rm Inc.: "Re: [Full-disclosure] FireFox Host: Buffer Overflow is not just exploitable on FireFox"
- In reply to: Martijn Lievaart: "Re: [Full-disclosure] PGPNet Upgrade path ?"
- Next in thread: Gary E. Miller: "RE: [Full-disclosure] PGPNet Upgrade path ?"
- Reply: Gary E. Miller: "RE: [Full-disclosure] PGPNet Upgrade path ?"
- Reply: Martijn Lievaart: "Re: [Full-disclosure] PGPNet Upgrade path ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|