RE: [Full-disclosure] Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow
From: Larry Seltzer (larry_at_larryseltzer.com)
Date: 09/09/05
- Previous message: n e w s: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow"
- In reply to: Dave Aitel: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow"
- Next in thread: Bruce Ediger: "RE: [Full-disclosure] Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow"
- Reply: Bruce Ediger: "RE: [Full-disclosure] Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'Dave Aitel'" <dave@immunitysec.com> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:09:25 -0400
>>Right now, everyone knows they are at risk, and what to do about it - we
can stop using Firefox if we think it's a high enough risk vulnerability to
do so. This is definately better than just being in the dark for another
week or so until they get the patch done.
Whatever. My point was that he treated the two situations differently. Why?
Larry Seltzer
eWEEK.com Security Center Editor
http://security.eweek.com/
http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer
Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
larryseltzer@ziffdavis.com
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: n e w s: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow"
- In reply to: Dave Aitel: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow"
- Next in thread: Bruce Ediger: "RE: [Full-disclosure] Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow"
- Reply: Bruce Ediger: "RE: [Full-disclosure] Mozilla Firefox "Host:" Buffer Overflow"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|