Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: The Wireless Networking Excuse
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 08/30/05
- Previous message: fd_at_ew.nsci.us: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: The Wireless Networking Excuse"
- In reply to: womber: "[Full-disclosure] Re: The Wireless Networking Excuse"
- Next in thread: Jackson McKinley: "Re: [Full-disclosure] The Wireless Networking Excuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: womber <womber@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:59:30 -0400
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:33:06 CDT, womber said:
> It is an interesting point. I have thought about it myself in the
> context of having my personal access point open to the public and if
> someone hopped on and downloaded something.
> Would I be resposible if they tracked it back to my AP?
Anybody who tries the "The giant pink iguana with a pringle's can did it"
defense had better make damned sure they can prove in a court of law that
there was indeed a giant pink iguana. And at that point, you may have to
explain why you knowingly provided access to allow the commission of a
crime - "aiding and abetting" isn't someplace you want to be......
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: fd_at_ew.nsci.us: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: The Wireless Networking Excuse"
- In reply to: womber: "[Full-disclosure] Re: The Wireless Networking Excuse"
- Next in thread: Jackson McKinley: "Re: [Full-disclosure] The Wireless Networking Excuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]