[Full-disclosure] Pipe dreams & candy canes [Was: perfect security architecture (network )]
From: Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (fergdawg_at_netzero.net)
Date: 08/09/05
- Previous message: Charles Heselton: "RE: [Full-disclosure] perfect security architecture (network)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 01:44:17 GMT To: charles.heselton@gmail.com
The closest approximation of "100% network security" comes
in the form of a pair of wire-cutters...
- ferg
p.s. Network security is an architecture, and most importantly,
it is a frame of mind...
-- "Charles Heselton" <charles.heselton@gmail.com> wrote:
Although Daniel's comments may be tongue-in-cheek, there is some
truth. Here are a few ideas that have become more or less mantras
for me, personally....
There IS NO *perfect* security.
-- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg@netzero.net or fergdawg@sbcglobal.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: Charles Heselton: "RE: [Full-disclosure] perfect security architecture (network)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]