Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversialCiscoSecurity Presentation
From: Geo. (geoincidents_at_nls.net)
Date: 07/30/05
- Previous message: William Warren: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Lynn Preso."
- In reply to: DAN MORRILL: "Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial CiscoSecurity Presentation"
- Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:47:56 -0400
> >From what I understand (I am writing a major paper on Intellectual
Property
> Protection right now, the Joy of being a student) the creator of the data
> has the direct right under Title 17 and the DMCA to determine how the data
> will be used (hence expiring CDR's and DRM).
This is incorrect as far as title 17 goes, copyright only gives control over
making copies and public performance, there must be a contract for any
additional restrictions. See http://www.theyscrewedusagain.com if you want
some good info for your paper. I would suggest you take a look specifically
at the quote from the 1908 congress that extended copyright law to cover
music as well, pretty interesting stuff.
http://www.theyscrewedusagain.com/copyrightact1909.htm
Geo.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Previous message: William Warren: "Re: [Full-disclosure] Lynn Preso."
- In reply to: DAN MORRILL: "Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial CiscoSecurity Presentation"
- Next in thread: Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu: "Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]